chair.jpg (11036 bytes)


Professionally Speaking welcomes letters and articles on topics of interest to teachers. We reserve the right to edit letters for length. To be considered for publication, all letters must be signed and provide the writer's daytime phone number. Letters should be addressed to: The Editor, Professionally Speaking, 121 Bloor Street East, 6th Floor, Toronto ON M4W 3M5; e-mail: ps@oct.ca


Separate Sexual Abuse

I would like to object to the College misconduct regulation definition of abuse, to wit: "abusing students physically, sexually, verbally, psychologically or emotionally." Lumping all of these together is prejudicial and unfair because people usually assume the worst. A teacher charged with "abusing students physically, sexually, verbally, psychologically or emotionally" would almost automatically be considered a sex offender. Even if he or she were eventually cleared, suspicion and doubt would linger.

I do not condone abuse of students in any way. But a teacher who strikes a student or humiliates or intimidates one is a much different offender than the teacher who sexually abuses one. I think the College should consider making sexual abuse a separate category to protect the reputations of teachers accused of non-sexual offences.

Brian McKenzie
Brian McKenzie teaches at Patrick Fogarty Secondary School in Orillia.

Don't Lower Standards

The proposed changes for technological teacher candidates say, "people with one year of work experience plus a degree will be eligible for the technological studies program." Work will also include co-op experience. These lowered standards are a slap in the eye for all tradespeople, technicians and technologists. The average tradesperson fulfills 8,000 hours of apprenticeship time before becoming a journeyperson and more hours after that to become a master. The hours are a combination of work experience and school.

A technician or a technologist has two or three years of college, which stresses practical application. When the audience is comprised of restless 16-year-olds, the person with the practical examples holds their attention longer than the person who can perform a chalkboard’s worth of calculations.

I realize that tech teachers are a rare find these days, but these changes would make the standards too low. The door would be open to all those who can’t make it in their chosen field. Is this what we want in our schools?

Judith Little
Judith Little teaches technological design at Preston High School in Chatham.

Evaluating Professional Practices

The late Justice James McRuer, who chaired the 1968 Royal Commission inquiry into civil rights, set out the philosophy that has guided self-regulation in this province for the last 30 years. He wrote: "The public must be able to rely on the judgement of those who are empowered to decide that persons licensed to practise a profession or engaged in a self-governing occupation are qualified. That being so, the responsible and experienced members of a profession or occupation on whom the power of self-government is conferred should be in the best position to set the standards to be met and the qualifications of anyone who aspires to enter the profession or occupation."

The Education Minister should heed the recommendations of Justice McRuer and let the College carry out its mandate responsibly and professionally, without political interference. Ontario teachers should defy any attempt by this government to evaluate their professional practice until they are given a clear mandate from the College to comply. Teaching is inherently extremely complicated and thus difficult to assess.

The closest analogy to teaching may be emergency room medicine. These physicians never know what will come through the doors. All their expertise must be constantly ready for recall and deployment, in any number of predictable and new combinations. They must decide instantly what to do, what not to do and when to change.

All those qualities are true of teachers’ engagements with their students. Teachers operate under other disadvantages, too. First, while all humans share a common anatomical structure, no child’s particular combination of personal, intellectual, physical and social qualities is the same. The combination, just in one student, may change dramatically from day to day. And teachers, unlike physicians in the emergency room, work with many students simultaneously in need of diagnosis and instant prescription. And the teacher is alone in the classroom.

How do you evaluate that?

Barrington A. Morrison
Barrington A. Morrison is a convenor at Elia Middle School in North York.